Notebookcheck.com reviews the new HP Spectre x360 15, which is equipped with a Core i7-8750H processor, an NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q GPU, a 2 TB SSD and a 4K 15.6-inch touchscreen. Read on to find out how this 15.6-inch convertible fares against its 2-in-1 competitors., HP Spectre x360 15 (Core i7-8750H, GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 2 TB SSD, 4K) Convertible rövid értékelés HP Pavilion 15-cx0086nr Gaming Laptop, 15.6" Full-HD IPS Display, Intel Core i7-8750H Hexa-Core 2.2GHz, NVIDIA GTX 1050 4GB, 1TB SATA HDD + 128GB Solid State Drive, 12GB DDR4, 802.11ac, Bluetooth, Win10Home. This product has not been reviewed yet. Condition Factory Reconditioned. Screen Size 15.6". Az Aero 14 a legtöbb laptopnál ügyesebben egyensúlyoz ezen a téren. A Core i7-8750H és GeForce GTX 1050 Ti kombinációjával 3D alkalmazások futtatása közben hangos tud lenni. Szerencsére, a Gigabyte által beállított ventilátormódoknak köszönhetően az Aero 14 alapjáraton, illetve kis terhelés alatt csendes. Komolyabb We benchmark MSI Prestige P65 (GTX 1050 Ti) i7-8750H (2.20 GHz) GTX 1050 Ti gaming laptop in battery life, weight, display, price, and performance benchmarks review in latest games and at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K using multiple quality settings. (GTX 1050 Ti) is a very light laptop at 1.9 Kg. MSI Prestige P65 (GTX 1050 Ti) has an outstanding Intel Core i7-8750H NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (4GB GDDR5) 32GB DDR4, 2666 MHz 500GB NVMe SSD + 1TB HDD, 5400 rpm 15.6", Full HD (1920 x 1080), IPS Windows 10 Home Detailed review DISPLAY: 15.6-inch, 1920 x 1080, IPS Name AUO B156HAN04.4 Diagonal 15.6" Pixel density 141.21 ppi Brightness 262 cd/m 2 sRGB 53% PWM frequency No PWM (Flicker-Free) Intel Core i7-8750H processor (up to 3.9 GHz) 8 GB DDR4 2666 MHz RAM 256 GB M.2 SSD 15.6" FHD IPS 1920 x 1080 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4 GB Gigabit Wave 2 WiFi. Up to 1.73 Gbps with 2X2 802.11ac Microsoft Windows 10 Home Our partners are electronics experts who test and verify that each product is 100% functional before it leaves the factory. Compra Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-71TV Notebook Gaming con Processore Intel Core i7-8750H, RAM 16 GB DDR4, 256 GB SSD, 1000 GB HDD, Display 15.6" FHD, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB, Windows 10 Home, Nero. Spedizione gratuita su ordini idonei eLVDxd. em10x 289 reais con 90 centavos sem jurosem10x 538 reais con 80 centavos sem jurosem10x 699 reais con 90 centavos sem jurosem10x 493 reais con 50 centavos sem jurosCalificación de 5. 18 589 reais con 90 centavos sem jurosCalificación de 5. 3 281 reais con 06 centavos Calificación de 5. 189 20 dias após sua compraCalificación de 5. 343 206 reais con 15 centavos Calificación de 5. 3 112 reais con 95 centavos Calificación de 5. 439 em 2 coresCalificación de 5. 135 649 reais con 90 centavos sem jurosCalificación de 5. 707 em 3 coresem10x 702 reais con 80 centavos sem jurosCalificación de 5. 10 359 reais con 70 centavos sem jurosCalificación de 5. 34 em 2 coresem10x 122 reais con 90 centavos sem jurosCalificación de 5. 439 em 2 coresem10x 798 reais con 90 centavos sem jurosCalificación de 5. 10 de 5. 803 367 reais con 20 centavos sem jurosCalificación de 5. 45 669 reais con 90 centavos sem jurosCalificación de 5. 707 em 3 coresem10x 369 reais con 90 centavos sem jurosUsadoem10x 619 reais con 90 centavos sem jurosUsadoem10x 419 reais con 90 centavos sem jurosUsadoem10x 699 reais con 90 centavos sem jurosUsadoem10x 699 reais con 90 centavos sem jurosUsadoem10x 499 reais con 90 centavos sem jurosUsadoem10x 373 reais con 75 centavos sem jurosUsadoUsadoDisponível em 2 coresem12x 336 reais con 41 centavos Usadoem10x 399 reais con 90 centavos sem jurosUsadoem10x 449 reais con 90 centavos sem jurosUsadoem12x 295 reais con 59 centavos Usadoem12x 316 reais con 25 centavos Usadoem12x 566 reais con 99 centavos Usadoem12x 306 reais con 36 centavos Usadoem12x 403 reais con 34 centavos Usadoem12x 296 reais con 58 centavos Usadoem12x 444 reais con 86 centavos Usadoem10x 549 reais con 90 centavos sem jurosCalificación de 5. 44 629 reais con 90 centavos sem jurosO frete grátis está sujeito ao peso, preço e distância do envio. Mid-range gamer. The Coffee Lake hexa-core processor and the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti graphics card can display all current games smoothly on the matte Full HD IPS display. On top of that, the device offers 8 GB of RAM in dual-channel mode, Intel Optane Memory and a decent keyboard. However, it also has some Pavilion Gaming 15 series consists of gaming notebooks that are positioned underneath the HP Omen series. HP has equipped its Pavilion models with upper mid-range graphics cards while the Omen models contain high-end GPUs. We tested the Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000, one of the better configurations of the series that was equipped with a GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB, a few months ago. Our current test unit comes with a hexa-core Core i7-8750H and a GeForce GTX 1050 Ti graphics card. The Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52, Medion Erazer P6705, Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH and Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42 are among our test unit's comparison both Pavilion models have the same build, we will not go into details about the case, connectivity, input devices and speakers. For further information on these aspects, please take a look at our review of the Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000. Memory8 GB , DDR4-2666, Dual-Channel, two RAM slots both occupied inch 169, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, BOE07A1, IPS, 60 Hz, glossy noMainboardIntel Cannon Lake HM370StorageIntel Optane 16 GB MEMPEK1J016GAH + HGST HTS721010A9E630 1 TB HDD, 869 GB freeSoundcardRealtek ALC295 Intel Cannon Lake PCHConnections4 USB / Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections combined audio jack, Card Reader SDXC, TPM RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN 10/100/1000MBit/s, Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN PCIe Adapter a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/, Bluetooth x width x depth in mm x 365 x = 1 x x in Wh, 4550 mAh Lithium-Ion, VOperating SystemMicrosoft Windows 10 Home 64 BitCameraWebcam HDPrimary Camera MPixAdditional featuresSpeakers Stereo, Keyboard Chiclet, Keyboard Light yes, McAfee LiveSafe trial version, 12 Months kg = oz / pounds, Power Supply 442 g = oz / poundsNote The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications. Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0 Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131 HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000 HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH DIN A4 ❌390 mm / inch 266 mm / inch 27 mm / inch lbs390 mm / inch 266 mm / inch 27 mm / inch lbs378 mm / inch 267 mm / inch 27 mm / inch lbs366 mm / inch 254 mm / 10 inch mm / 1 inch lbs365 mm / inch mm / inch mm / 1 inch lbs360 mm / inch 268 mm / inch 28 mm / inch lbs297 mm / inch 210 mm / inch 1 mm / inch lbs While the Pavilion Gaming 15 model we already tested was equipped with a Thunderbolt 3 port, our current test unit only offers USB Type-C Gen 1. This can be used to transfer data and also to connect external screens. We tried it please note You need a separate adapter for DisplayPort via USB-C. According to the maintenance manual, the Type-C port supports DisplayPort resolutions of up to 4096x2304 pixels at 60 Hz. In total, the laptop has two video outputs. 03570105140175210245280315350385420455490525560595630TooltipWhile the Pavilion Gaming 15 model we already tested was equipped with a 144-Hz display, our current test unit contains a 60-Hz model. The display has a native resolution of 1920x1080 pixels. The contrast 16071 is good, but brightness could be better at cd/m², particularly considering the price of the Pavilion. We generally consider values above 300 cd/m² and 10001 as good. At least the screen is bright enough for indoor use. The screen uses PWM at brightness levels up to 90%. Its frequency is quite low at 208 Hz and could cause headaches and/or eye problems for sensitive users. 262cd/m²257cd/m²265cd/m²234cd/m²241cd/m²229cd/m²198cd/m²218cd/m²218cd/m² Distribution of brightnessBOE07A1X-Rite i1Pro 2Maximum 265 cd/m² Nits Average cd/m² Minimum cd/m²Brightness Distribution 75 %Center on Battery 208 cd/m²Contrast 16071 Black cd/m²ΔE Color Greyscale sRGB Argyll 3D38% AdobeRGB 1998 Argyll 3D AdobeRGB 1998 Argyll 3D sRGB Argyll 3D Display P3 Argyll 3DGamma Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ngIPS, 1920x1080, Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0IPS, 1920x1080, Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DRIPS, 1920x1080, Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000IPS, 1920x1080, Erazer P6705-MD61131TN, 1920x1080, Legion Y530-15ICHIPS, 1920x1080, Display P3 60% 0% 67% -8% -4% sRGB 47% 0% 55% -8% -3% AdobeRGB 1998 56% 0% 63% -8% -4%Response Times-5%24%64%27%1% Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *47 ?23, 24 ?24, ? ? ? ? Response Time Black / White *31 ?17, 14 ?18, ?12, 1029% ?6, ?10, 648% ?18, PWM Frequency208 ?90Screen10%1%11%-68%-28%Brightness middle241299 24%252 5% 48%200 -17% 17%Brightness236284 20%237 0%351 49%186 -21%264 12%Brightness Distribution7588 17%86 15%85 13%85 13%88 17%Black Level * -60% -40% -140% -187% -180%Contrast16071246 -22%1200 -25%993 -38%465 -71%673 -58%Colorchecker dE 2000 * -3% 9% 14% -135% -2%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * 13% 18% 21% -120% -100%Greyscale dE 2000 * 11% 27% 32% -128% 26% 88% 86% 94% 95% 112% 90%CCT7042 92%6397 102%7291 89%7028 92%12614 52%6112 106%Color Space Percent of AdobeRGB 19983857 50%38 0%60 58%35 -8%36 -5%Color Space Percent of sRGB5987 47%59 0%91 54%55 -7%57 -3%Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * Average Program / Settings20% / 17%8% / 4%46% / 28%-16% / -43%-10% / -19%* ... smaller is better Screen Flickering / PWM Pulse-Width ModulationℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation PWM . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering flickering / PWM detected 208 Hz ≤ 90 % brightness settingThe display backlight flickers at 208 Hz Likely utilizing PWM Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness frequency of 208 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and comparison 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19200 minimum 5 - maximum 3846000 Hz was measured. We measured a relatively decent DeltaE 2000 deviation of ex-works. This is not too far off from the target range of DeltaE below 3. The display does not have a blue cast. The color spaces AdobeRGB and sRGB are not displayed fully - we measured color-space coverage of 38% AdobeRGB and 59% sRGB. The color profile provided by us see above can be used to improve the color accuracy of the screen. However, please make sure that your device is equipped with exactly the same display model manufacturer + model number as the one in our test unit. Otherwise, colors could actually worsen rather than improve. Manufacturers often use different displays from various manufacturers within the same notebook model. Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry ghosting. Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White31 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17 ms rise↘ 14 ms fallThe screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for comparison, all tested devices range from minimum to 240 maximum ms. » 80 % of all devices are means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices ms. ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey47 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 23 ms rise↘ 24 ms fallThe screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for comparison, all tested devices range from minimum to 636 maximum ms. » 77 % of all devices are means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices 35 ms. HP has equipped the Pavilion with an IPS panel with stable viewing angles. This means that the screen can be read from any position. The display brightness is sufficient for indoor use but will make using the device out of doors difficult or rather impossible, particularly as the maximum brightness is even lower when the device is running on battery 208 cd/m².The Pavilion Gaming 15 from Hewlett-Packard is a mid-range gaming notebook. The device has sufficient processing power for all normal applications and can display all current games smoothly. Our test unit is available for around $1,000. The starting price for other configurations is $ Pavilion is equipped with a hexa-core Intel Core i7-8750H Coffee Lake. This is a mobile CPU with a TDP of 45 watts. Hewlett-Packard allows users to increase the TDP to 90 watts for a short time. The processor clocks at GHz base rate but can be increased to GHz six cores, 4 GHz four cores or GHz one or two cores in turbo is basically no difference between Coffee Lake and Kaby Lake architecture. Therefore, the performance per MHz has remained the same. The higher performance of the Core i7-8750H compared to its predecessors is based mainly on the additional cores. The improved production process also enables Coffee Lake chips to have higher clock processor clocks at - 4 GHz during the first few seconds of our Cinebench multithread test. After that, the clock rate drops to GHz - GHz. The single-thread benchmark is completed at - GHz. These are the results when running on power supply. On battery, the processor clocks at - GHz multithread and - GHz single-thread.We can find out whether the turbo is used continuously by running the multithread Cinebench R15 benchmark in a loop for about 30 minutes. The results drop slightly between the first and second round but then remain constant for the remainder of the test. This means that the turbo is used. However, the Pavilion cannot keep up with the Acer Nitro 5, which is equipped with the same CPU/GPU combination. The latter offers results above 1000 points throughout the entire test. 06012018024030036042048054060066072078084090096010201080TooltipMedion Erazer P6705-MD61131 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H Ø969 Clock rates during the CB15 loopCinebench R10 Shading 32Bit6692 Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit32391 Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit6630 Cinebench OpenGL fps Cinebench CPU Multi Points Cinebench CPU Single Points Cinebench R15 Ref. Match % Cinebench R15 OpenGL fps Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit1049 Points Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit173 Points HelpCinebench R15 CPU Single 64BitAverage of class Gaming - 312, n=245, last 2 years 251 Points ∼100% +45%Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DRIntel Core i7-8750H 177 Points ∼71% +2%HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000Intel Core i7-8750H 175 Points ∼70% +1%Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131Intel Core i7-8750H 173 Points ∼69% 0%HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ngIntel Core i7-8750H 173 Points ∼69% Average Intel Core i7-8750H 163 - 177, n=86 172 Points ∼69% -1%Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICHIntel Core i5-8300H 171 Points ∼68% -1%Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0AMD Ryzen 7 2700U 150 Points ∼60% -13% CPU Multi 64BitAverage of class Gaming 400 - 5663, n=244, last 2 years 2607 Points ∼100% +149%Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131Intel Core i7-8750H 1116 Points ∼43% +6%Average Intel Core i7-8750H 863 - 1251, n=93 1113 Points ∼43% +6%Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DRIntel Core i7-8750H 1090 Points ∼42% +4%HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ngIntel Core i7-8750H 1049 Points ∼40% HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000Intel Core i7-8750H 863 Points ∼33% -18%Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICHIntel Core i5-8300H 830 Points ∼32% -21%Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0AMD Ryzen 7 2700U 661 Points ∼25% -37%Cinebench CPU Multi 64BitAverage of class Gaming 11 - n=24, last 2 years Points ∼100% +186%Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DRIntel Core i7-8750H Points ∼40% +15%Average Intel Core i7-8750H - n=41 Points ∼38% +8%Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131Intel Core i7-8750H Points ∼37% +7%HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ngIntel Core i7-8750H Points ∼35% HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000Intel Core i7-8750H Points ∼30% -15%Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0AMD Ryzen 7 2700U Points ∼23% -33% CPU Single 64BitAverage of class Gaming - n=24, last 2 years Points ∼100% +115%Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DRIntel Core i7-8750H Points ∼47% +1%HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000Intel Core i7-8750H Points ∼47% +1%HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ngIntel Core i7-8750H Points ∼46% Average Intel Core i7-8750H - 2, n=40 Points ∼46% -1%Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131Intel Core i7-8750H Points ∼46% -1%Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0AMD Ryzen 7 2700U Points ∼40% -14%Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32BitAverage of class Gaming 30491 - 85088, n=24, last 2 years 52989 Points ∼100% +64%Average Intel Core i7-8750H 29664 - 35307, n=25 33163 Points ∼63% +2%HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ngIntel Core i7-8750H 32391 Points ∼61% Rendering Single 32BitAverage of class Gaming 5847 - 11940, n=24, last 2 years 8368 Points ∼100% +26%HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ngIntel Core i7-8750H 6630 Points ∼79% Average Intel Core i7-8750H 6236 - 6645, n=25 6479 Points ∼77% -2%Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core ScoreAverage Intel Core i7-8750H 20725 - 22665, n=13 21871 Points ∼100% +3%HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ngIntel Core i7-8750H 21215 Points ∼97% 32 Bit Single-Core ScoreAverage Intel Core i7-8750H 3734 - 4163, n=13 3995 Points ∼100% +1%HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ngIntel Core i7-8750H 3955 Points ∼99% Geekbench 64 Bit Multi-Core ScoreAverage of class Gaming last 2 years 38127 Points ∼100% +99%Average Intel Core i7-8750H 17048 - 22006, n=8 19665 Points ∼52% +3%HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ngIntel Core i7-8750H 19159 Points ∼50% 64 Bit Single-Core ScoreAverage of class Gaming last 2 years 6453 Points ∼100% +33%HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ngIntel Core i7-8750H 4854 Points ∼75% Average Intel Core i7-8750H 4548 - 4997, n=8 4839 Points ∼75% 0%Geekbench - 64 Bit Multi-Core ScoreAverage of class Gaming 18976 - 71700, n=33, last 2 years 43914 Points ∼100% +117%Average Intel Core i7-8750H 17709 - 23313, n=17 21069 Points ∼48% +4%HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ngIntel Core i7-8750H 20235 Points ∼46% 64 Bit Single-Core ScoreAverage of class Gaming 5249 - 8936, n=33, last 2 years 7154 Points ∼100% +43%HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ngIntel Core i7-8750H 5009 Points ∼70% Average Intel Core i7-8750H 4669 - 5146, n=17 4982 Points ∼70% -1%* ... smaller is betterThe Pavilion does not lack performance power. The hexa-core processor performs well in all the usual areas of use and offers sufficient reserves for the next few years. The dedicated graphics card also enables gaming. In addition, the combination of a hexa-core processor, RAM in dual-channel mode and Intel Optane Memory ensures a smooth-running system. The results of the PCMark benchmarks confirm our very good impression. We did not encounter any issues 10 PCMark 7 Score 6418 pointsPCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 4259 pointsPCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 4820 pointsPCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 5249 pointsPCMark 10 Score 4732 pointsHelp PCMark 10 ScoreAverage of class Gaming 4477 - 9331, n=197, last 2 years 7264 Points ∼100% +54%Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DRGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7 5001 Points ∼69% +6%Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 4532 - 5162, n=10 4851 Points ∼67% +3%Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICHGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G 4812 Points ∼66% +2%Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ 4767 Points ∼66% +1%HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ngGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel Optane 16 GB MEMPEK1J016GAH + HGST HTS721010A9E630 1 TB HDD 4732 Points ∼65% HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ 4724 Points ∼65% 0%Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0Radeon RX 560X Laptop, R7 2700U, SK Hynix HFS128G39TND 3763 Points ∼52% -20% EssentialsAverage of class Gaming 7334 - 12176, n=196, last 2 years 10462 Points ∼100% +25%Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DRGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7 8735 Points ∼83% +4%Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICHGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G 8418 Points ∼80% 0%HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ngGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel Optane 16 GB MEMPEK1J016GAH + HGST HTS721010A9E630 1 TB HDD 8388 Points ∼80% Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 7142 - 9110, n=10 8371 Points ∼80% 0%Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ 8186 Points ∼78% -2%HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ 7598 Points ∼73% -9%Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0Radeon RX 560X Laptop, R7 2700U, SK Hynix HFS128G39TND 6733 Points ∼64% -20% ProductivityAverage of class Gaming 6161 - 11833, n=196, last 2 years 9459 Points ∼100% +40%Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICHGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G 7246 Points ∼77% +8%Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DRGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7 7088 Points ∼75% +5%Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 6607 - 7332, n=10 6989 Points ∼74% +4%Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ 6830 Points ∼72% +1%HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ngGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel Optane 16 GB MEMPEK1J016GAH + HGST HTS721010A9E630 1 TB HDD 6739 Points ∼71% HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ 6629 Points ∼70% -2%Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0Radeon RX 560X Laptop, R7 2700U, SK Hynix HFS128G39TND 5574 Points ∼59% -17% Digital Content CreationAverage of class Gaming 5288 - 16424, n=196, last 2 years 10573 Points ∼100% +108%HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ 5682 Points ∼54% +12%Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DRGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7 5485 Points ∼52% +8%Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 5070 - 5616, n=10 5305 Points ∼50% +4%Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ 5258 Points ∼50% +3%HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ngGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel Optane 16 GB MEMPEK1J016GAH + HGST HTS721010A9E630 1 TB HDD 5088 Points ∼48% Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICHGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G 4959 Points ∼47% -3%Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0Radeon RX 560X Laptop, R7 2700U, SK Hynix HFS128G39TND 3855 Points ∼36% -24%PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2Average of class Gaming 3570 - 6657, n=42, last 2 years 5109 Points ∼100% +20%HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ 4606 Points ∼90% +8%Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DRGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7 4371 Points ∼86% +3%HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ngGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel Optane 16 GB MEMPEK1J016GAH + HGST HTS721010A9E630 1 TB HDD 4259 Points ∼83% Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 3894 - 4371, n=10 4162 Points ∼81% -2%Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICHGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G 4129 Points ∼81% -3%Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ 4017 Points ∼79% -6%Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0Radeon RX 560X Laptop, R7 2700U, SK Hynix HFS128G39TND 3860 Points ∼76% -9% Work Score Accelerated v2Average of class Gaming 4622 - 7085, n=41, last 2 years 5991 Points ∼100% +14%Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DRGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7 5370 Points ∼90% +2%Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICHGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G 5369 Points ∼90% +2%Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ 5346 Points ∼89% +2%Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 4973 - 5461, n=10 5312 Points ∼89% +1%HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ 5308 Points ∼89% +1%HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ngGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel Optane 16 GB MEMPEK1J016GAH + HGST HTS721010A9E630 1 TB HDD 5249 Points ∼88% Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0Radeon RX 560X Laptop, R7 2700U, SK Hynix HFS128G39TND 4810 Points ∼80% -8%HP has equipped the Pavilion with Intel Optane Memory that consists of a hard drive 1 TB of storage, 7200 rpm and a 16-GB NVMe SSD from Intel. The SSD is used as a fast cache for the hard drive. This should speed up start-ups, searching for files and storing large sets of data significantly. Overall, the transfer rates are good. Optane is used primarily to increase the read rates and the test unit's write rates are accordingly low in comparison. The random read rates are particularly high. The Optane transfer rates can be positioned between those of SATA III SSDs and NVMe SSDs. Users do not have to use Optane. Alternatively, they could also go for a combination of an SSD as system drive and an HDD for storage, or simply just use one of the two storage devices. Sequential Read 851 MB/s Sequential Write MB/s HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ngIntel Optane 16 GB MEMPEK1J016GAH + HGST HTS721010A9E630 1 TB HDDAcer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0SK Hynix HFS128G39TNDAcer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DRIntel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQMedion Erazer P6705-MD61131Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQLenovo Legion Y530-15ICHToshiba KBG30ZMT128GAverage Intel Optane 16 GB MEMPEK1J016GAH + HGST HTS721010A9E630 1 TB HDD CrystalDiskMark / 6-25%80%298%266%9%0% Write 23% 33% 119%107 81% 21% 0% Read -68% -68% -51% -56% -55% 0% Write -14%581 267%1268 701%1439 809%349 120% 0% Read -43%934 6%992 13%2011 129%736 -16%880 0% Write 4K -16% 74%535 231% 74% -35% 0% Read 4K -25% 17%601 110% 14%308 8%287 0% Write Seq -15%571 257%1938 1113%1441 802% -5% 0% Read Seq Q32T1929512 -45%1389 50%2306 148%3516 278%1262 36%929 0%AS SSD-17%217%649%310%21%0% Seq -45%1321 55%1235 45%2724 219%1231 44%854 0% Seq -14%554 277%1829 1144%1365 829% -10%147 0% 4K -78% -69% -67% -56% -63% 0% 4K -8% 59% 61% 72% -40% 0% 4K-64 383%505 1100%1160 2656%567 1247% 697% 0% 4K-64 -7%511 272%1808 1217% 235% -43% 0% Access Time Read * 99% 99% 100% 99% 96%15 -0% Access Time Write * -526% 9% 12% 14% -567% -0% Score Read233274 18%670 188%1319 466%886 280%497 113%233 0% Score Write211194 -8%661 213%2087 889%699 231%128 -39%211 0% Score Total577600 4%1643 185%4113 613%1983 244%838 45%577 0% Copy ISO MB/ 0% Copy Program MB/ 0% Copy Game MB/ 0%Total Average Program / Settings-21% / -20%149% / 159%474% / 501%288% / 292%15% / 16%0% / 0%* ... smaller is betterNvidia's dedicated GeForce GTX 1050 Ti belongs to the upper mid-range of graphics cards. The Pascal model supports DirectX 12 and reaches speeds of up to 1620 MHz. The GPU has 4096 MB of GDDR5 VRAM available. The results of the 3DMark benchmarks show that the GPU cannot quite reach its full potential in this device. Again, the Acer Nitro 5, equipped with the same CPU/GPU combination, reaches results that are 10 - 15% higher. The average clock rate of the GPU in the HP device was slightly lower than that of the Nitro 5 GPU. HP's Pavilion is equipped with the graphics-switching technology Optimus. This means that the device uses Intel's integrated UHD Graphics 630 for simpler, everyday workloads and when running on battery, and it switches to the Nvidia core for graphically demanding scenarios such as gaming. 3DMark 06 Standard Score 33957 points3DMark 11 Performance 8501 points3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score 87964 points3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score 25570 points3DMark Fire Strike Score 6286 points3DMark Time Spy Score 2196 pointsHelp 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPUAverage of class Gaming 1029 - 72070, n=236, last 2 years 36561 Points ∼100% +340%HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H 13030 Points ∼36% +57%Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICHNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i5-8300H 9909 Points ∼27% +19%Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 8304 - 10402, n=36 9591 Points ∼26% +15%Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DRNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H 9203 Points ∼25% +11%Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H 8624 Points ∼24% +4%Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0AMD Radeon RX 560X Laptop, AMD Ryzen 7 2700U 8451 Points ∼23% +2%HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ngNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H 8304 Points ∼23% 3DMark1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard GraphicsAverage of class Gaming 15902 - 192520, n=169, last 2 years 122595 Points ∼100% +163%HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H 74599 Points ∼61% +60%Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DRNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H 51337 Points ∼42% +10%Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICHNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i5-8300H 50387 Points ∼41% +8%Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 43721 - 53978, n=37 50013 Points ∼41% +7%Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H 47895 Points ∼39% +3%HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ngNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H 46618 Points ∼38% Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0AMD Radeon RX 560X Laptop, AMD Ryzen 7 2700U 34407 Points ∼28% -26%1920x1080 Fire Strike GraphicsAverage of class Gaming 781 - 53059, n=243, last 2 years 27044 Points ∼100% +298%HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H 10511 Points ∼39% +55%Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 6792 - 8376, n=38 7743 Points ∼29% +14%Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICHNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i5-8300H 7740 Points ∼29% +14%Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DRNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H 7682 Points ∼28% +13%Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H 7192 Points ∼27% +6%HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ngNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H 6792 Points ∼25% Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0AMD Radeon RX 560X Laptop, AMD Ryzen 7 2700U 6262 Points ∼23% -8%2560x1440 Time Spy GraphicsAverage of class Gaming 224 - 22547, n=243, last 2 years 10728 Points ∼100% +439%Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 1990 - 2536, n=16 2309 Points ∼22% +16%HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ngNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H 1990 Points ∼19% The hardware of the Pavilion is able to display all current games smoothly. Most of the games in our database can even be displayed at maximum resolution. Current games allow average to high quality settings. Older games that are less demanding on the hardware can be displayed with higher Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 DDOFAverage of class Gaming last 2 years fps ∼100% +127%HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 102 fps ∼63% +42%Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 61 - 97, n=23 fps ∼45% +2%HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ngIntel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile fps ∼44% Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICHIntel Core i5-8300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 61 fps ∼37% -15%The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing Nvidia HairWorks OffAverage of class Gaming - 449, n=180, last 2 years fps ∼100% +377%HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 50 fps ∼26% +25%MSI GE72 7RE-046Intel Core i7-7700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile fps ∼26% +22%Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DRIntel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile fps ∼24% +16%Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile - n=26 fps ∼24% +13%Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile fps ∼23% +7%HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ngIntel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 40 fps ∼21% Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0AMD Ryzen 7 2700U, AMD Radeon RX 560X Laptop fps ∼17% -17%Call of Duty Black Ops 4 - 1920x1080 Very High / OnHP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ngIntel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 44 fps ∼100% Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile - n=4 fps ∼94% -6%Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile fps ∼86% -14%MSI GE72 7RE-046Intel Core i7-7700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 26min - 45max fps ∼81% -19%Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0AMD Ryzen 7 2700U, AMD Radeon RX 560X Laptop fps ∼46% -54%We ran the game The Witcher 3 for about 60 minutes in Full HD resolution and high quality settings to find out whether the device can keep up the frame rate over a long period of time. The in-game character remains stationary during this entire period. We did not record a drop in the frame rate. 05101520253035404550556065707580859095100105110115120125130135140145150155160165170175180185190195200205210215220225230235240245250255260265270275280285290295300305310315320325330335340345TooltipGPU results during our The Witcher 3 testThe two fans in the Pavilion run at low speed constantly while the device is idling. This is due to HP's own BIOS function "Fan always on". If this is disabled, the cooling fans can occasionally stand still while the laptop is idling. There is a noticeable difference between when the fans are running during idle and when they are turned off. However, even then the device is not silent as the hard drive emits audible noise. This can only be avoided by exchanging the HDD for an SSD. The device becomes quite loud under load as the cooling fans turn up significantly. We measured 43 dBA during the stress test. The results are very similar at average load with a system noise of dBA. Noise Level Idle / / dBADVD 0 / dBALoad / 43 dBA 30 dBsilent40 dBAaudible50 dBAloud min , med , max Audix TM1, Arta 15 cm distance environment noise dBA dBA 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper rangehide median Fan NoiseHP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ngHP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ngi7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti MobileAcer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0R7 2700U, Radeon RX 560X LaptopAcer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DRi7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti MobileHP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-QMedion Erazer P6705-MD61131i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti MobileLenovo Legion Y530-15ICHi5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti MobileAverage NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile Average of class Gaming Noise2%-3%-2%-7%7%-1%4%off / environment * 5%30 2% 8%29 5%28 8% ? - n=324% ? - n=189, last 2 years20%Idle Minimum * 5%30 2% -5%29 5%28 8% ?28 - 34, n=35-0% ? - n=190, last 2 years16%Idle Average * -1%32 -5% -6%34 -11%28 8% ?28 - 35, n=35-4% ? - n=190, last 2 years10%Idle Maximum * 4%33 1% 2%43 -30% 14% ? - 44, n=35-2% ? - 51, n=190, last 2 years5%Load Average * 16%42 2% 6%44 -3% 18% ? - 50, n=354% ? - n=190, last 2 years-4%Witcher 3 ultra * -5%46 -9%45 -7%44 -5%40 5%Load Maximum *4346 -7%49 -14% -10%48 -12% -15% ? - 53, n=35-10% ?40 - n=191, last 2 years-24%* ... smaller is betterThe Pavilion during our stress testOur stress test Prime95 and FurMark running for at least an hour is completed differently depending on whether the Pavilion is running on power supply or in battery mode. When connected to the grid, the processor clocks at - 2 GHz while the graphics core reaches speeds of around 1600 MHz. On battery, the CPU throttles to 800 MHz and the GPU clocks at between 1300 and 1400 notebook heats up a little too much during our stress test. We registered temperatures above 50 °C in some areas. However, this is not too worrisome as the stress test represents an extreme scenario that will not occur during everyday use. We simply use this test to find out whether the system remains stable even at maximum load. The temperature development was even more significant during our The Witcher 3 test with the game running at Full HD resolution and high quality settings for an hour. The temperatures are fine during everyday use. °C105 °C79 °C111 F °C96 °C110 °C105 F °C82 F27 °C81 °C87 F Maximum °C = 111 FAverage °C = 95 F °C129 F52 °C126 °C116 °C97 °C97 °C97 °C78 °C80 °C85 F Maximum °C = 129 FAverage 38 °C = 100 F Power Supply max. 42 °C = 108 F Room Temperature 23 °C = 73 F FIRT 550-Pocket± The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is °C / 95 F, compared to the average of °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.± The maximum temperature on the upper side is °C / 111 F, compared to the average of °C / 105 F, ranging from to °C for the class Gaming.- The bottom heats up to a maximum of °C / 129 F, compared to the average of °C / 110 F+ In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of °C / 93 F.± Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of °C / 93 F.+ The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of °C / F and are therefore cool to the touch. ± The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was °C / 84 F °C / F. HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ngi7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti MobileAcer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0R7 2700U, Radeon RX 560X LaptopAcer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DRi7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti MobileHP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-QMedion Erazer P6705-MD61131i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti MobileLenovo Legion Y530-15ICHi5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti MobileAverage NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile Average of class Gaming Heat-4%-22%-11%5%-18%-5%-14%Maximum Upper Side * -7%52 -18%46 -4%45 -2% 3% ?30 - n=36-5%47 ? - 61, n=189, last 2 years-7%Maximum Bottom * 18%55 -2%52 3%43 20%52 3% ? - n=3610% ?30 - 68, n=189, last 2 years6%Idle Upper Side * -22%36 -46%29 -18%25 -2%32 -30% ? - 36, n=35-16% ? - 46, n=187, last 2 years-29%Idle Bottom * -5%32 -20%33 -24%26 3% -48% ? - n=35-8% ? - 45, n=187, last 2 years-25%* ... smaller is better dBA 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ngApple MacBook 12 Early 2016 GHzFrequency diagram checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devicesHP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng audio analysis- not very loud speakers dBBass 100 - 315 Hz- nearly no bass - on average lower than median± linearity of bass is average delta to prev. frequencyMids 400 - 2000 Hz+ balanced mids - only away from median+ mids are linear delta to prev. frequencyHighs 2 - 16 kHz+ balanced highs - only away from median+ highs are linear delta to prev. frequencyOverall 100 - Hz± linearity of overall sound is average difference to medianCompared to same class» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 23% worse» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 47%Compared to all devices tested» 48% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 45% worse» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%Apple MacBook 12 Early 2016 GHz audio analysis+ speakers can play relatively loud dBBass 100 - 315 Hz± reduced bass - on average lower than median± linearity of bass is average delta to prev. frequencyMids 400 - 2000 Hz+ balanced mids - only away from median+ mids are linear delta to prev. frequencyHighs 2 - 16 kHz+ balanced highs - only 2% away from median+ highs are linear delta to prev. frequencyOverall 100 - Hz+ overall sound is linear difference to medianCompared to same class» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 95% worse» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 50%Compared to all devices tested» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%The power consumption is normal on every level for this combination of hardware. We measured a maximum consumption of watts while idling. This increased to up to 144 watts during our stress test. Users can expect around 94 watts +/- 20 watts during everyday gaming use. The rated output of the power supply is 150 Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ngi7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti MobileAcer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0R7 2700U, Radeon RX 560X LaptopAcer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DRi7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti MobileHP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-QMedion Erazer P6705-MD61131i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti MobileLenovo Legion Y530-15ICHi5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti MobileAverage NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile Average of class Gaming Power Consumption-14%5%-10%12%-4%-19%-93%Idle Minimum * -27%5 9%6 -9%4 27% 18% ? - n=36-44% ?3 - 64, n=187, last 2 years-145%Idle Average * -18%7 18% -32%7 18%10 -18% ? - 20, n=36-40% ? - n=187, last 2 years-118%Idle Maximum * -51%11 8% -12%11 8% -16% ? - 25, n=36-29% ? - 76, n=186, last 2 years-117%Load Average *9479 16%91 3% 5%72 23% 2% ? - n=369% ? - 202, n=187, last 2 years-21%Witcher 3 ultra *8698 -14%97 -13% -18%79 8% -26%Load Maximum *144128 11%137 5% 7%158 -10% 14% ?100 - 163, n=369%238 ?99 - 418, n=186, last 2 years-65%* ... smaller is betterThe Pavilion reaches a runtime of 518 hours during our realistic Wi-Fi test. We use this test to simulate the load of browsing the Internet with the energy profile set to "balanced" and display brightness at around 150 cd/m². The HP Pavilion managed to keep going for 438 hours during our video test, for which we used the short film Big Buck Bunny coding, 1920x1080 pixels in a loop. The wireless modules are disabled and the energy-saving profile is turned on during this test with the display brightness set to 150 cd/m² again. This positions the Pavilion far below its sister model in terms of battery runtimes - although that is equipped with a stronger GPU. Why? The battery in our current test unit has a significantly lower capacity Wh vs. 70 Wh. On top of that, the battery has a rate of wear of 8%. The Acer Nitro 5, which is equipped with the same CPU/GPU combination, proves that it does not have to be this way. It manages to get a longer runtime out of its 48-Wh battery than both of the Pavilion Gaming 15 models we have battery has a capacity of WhBattery Runtime Idle without WLAN, min brightness 10h 49min WiFi Websurfing Edge 44 5h 18min Big Buck Bunny 1080p 4h 38min Load maximum brightness 1h 23min HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ngi7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, WhAcer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0R7 2700U, Radeon RX 560X Laptop, 48 WhAcer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DRi7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 48 WhHP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 70 WhMedion Erazer P6705-MD61131i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 62 WhLenovo Legion Y530-15ICHi5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, WhAverage of class Gaming Battery Runtime7%27%2%28%-23%11%Reader / Idle649752 16%478 -26%534 -18%575 ?57 - 1217, n=97, last 2 years-11% 54%378 ?56 - 747, n=93, last 2 years36%WiFi 7%418 31%375 18%400 26%245 -23%363 ?57 - 745, n=184, last 2 years14%Load8390 8%95 14%147 77%87 ?36 - 228, n=156, last 2 years5%Pros+ matte IPS display + Full HD resolution + decent keyboard + high storage capacity Cons- dark display - loud cooling fans - unstable/wobbly lid - heats up quite a lot under load - average battery runtimesThe HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng, provided by HP GermanyThe Pavilion Gaming 15 is a mid-range gaming notebook. The combination of a Core i7-8750H processor and a GeForce GTX 1050 Ti graphics card can display all games that are currently in our database smoothly. However, the most-demanding modern games should be played at lower settings. The hexa-core processor also offers sufficient processing power for applications beyond gaming loads. If you do not need a hexa-core processor and/or would like to save some money, you should take a look at a Pavilion model that is equipped with a quad-core Core Intel Optane Memory combination consists of a 1-TB HDD and a 16-GB NVMe SSD and ensures a fast-running system. The use of Optane is optional. The cache SSD could be replaced by a larger NVMe device from a different manufacturer, which could then be used as the system drive while the HDD would be used for data storage Full HD IPS display in the Pavilion offers stable viewing angles and good contrast. The brightness is too low for a device in this price range. Its battery runtimes are fine for a gaming notebook, although some comparable competitors have more to offer. The keyboard is quite good, particularly for a gaming has created a series of gaming notebooks that is positioned below the Omen series. These devices are supposed to offer as much gaming performance as possible for a comparatively low price. While the device fulfills this goal, it does not unleash waves of cooling fans in our test unit could also be better, as these produce a lot of noise. On top of that, the case itself is not quite as stable as we would have hoped for. For example, the relatively unstable display cover shows that a large part of the budget was spent on the device's insides rather than its outside. The Acer Nitro 5 is equipped with the same CPU/GPU combination but manages to get more performance out of these components while simultaneously offering significantly better battery runtimes. HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng - 12/12/2018 v6old Sascha Mölck Connectivity62 / 81 → 77% Application Performance93% Gaming - Weighted Average More articles related to this deviceHP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng Pavilion 15-cx SeriesRelated Articles Pricecompare Editor of the original article Sascha Mölck - Senior Tech Writer - 961 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2012What started as a side job during my computer science studies later became my main job For more than 20 years now I have been working as an editor and author in the IT sector. While working in the print sector I also contributed to the creation of various loose-leaf publications and published original written pieces. I have been working for Notebookcheck since completed my master's degree in translation at the University of Vienna a few years ago and have been working as a translator for English, German and French ever since. I first started translating for Notebookcheck in 2017 and have learned more about computers than I ever imagined, and I have even become the person my family turns to for advice when it comes to consumer electronics. Other than that I also focus on everything connected to sustainability and renewable energy. Sascha Mölck, 2018-12-14 Update 2018-12-17 Select Your Region Acessar para acessar conteúdo restrito Usando a pesquisa Você pode pesquisar facilmente em todo o site de diversas maneiras. Nome comercial Core i9 Número do documento 123456 Nome de código Alder Lake Operadores especiais “Ice Lake”, Ice AND Lake, Ice OR Lake, Ice* Links rápidos Também é possível experimentar os links rápidos abaixo para ver resultados das pesquisas mais populares. Informações sobre produto Suporte Drivers e software Pesquisas recentes Acessar para acessar conteúdo restrito Busca avançada Pesquisar apenas em Título Descrição ID do conteúdo Sign in to access restricted content. A versão do navegador que você está usando não é recomendada para este a possibilidade de fazer a atualização para a última versão do seu navegador clicando em um dos links a seguir. Safari Chrome Edge Firefox Conheça os processadores Intel mais recentes e experimente o desempenho aprimorado Não é possível carregar as informações sobre preços no momento. Comparar produtos Intel Essenciais Preço recomendado para o cliente Especificações da CPU Frequência da Tecnologia Intel Turbo Boost Frequência baseada em processador Frequência de TDP Configurável - baixo Informações complementares Opções integradas disponíveis Especificações de memória Tamanho máximo de memória de acordo com o tipo de memória Nº máximo de canais de memória Largura de banda máxima da memória Compatibilidade com memória ECC ‡ Gráficos de processador Gráficos do processador ‡ Frequência da base gráfica Máxima frequência dinâmica da placa gráfica Quantidade máxima de memória gráfica de vídeo Resolução máxima eDP - tela plana integrada‡ Tecnologia Intel InTru 3D Tecnologia de Alta Definição Intel Clear Video Intel Clear Video Technology Nº de monitores aceitos ‡ Opções de expansão Configurações PCI Express ‡ Nº máximo de linhas PCI Express Especificações de encapsulamento Configuração máxima da CPU Tecnologias avançadas Compatível com Intel Optane™ Memory ‡ Tecnologia Intel Speed Shift Tecnologia Intel Turbo Boost ‡ Tecnologia Hyper-Threading Intel ‡ Extensões do conjunto de instruções Intel Intel Intel AVX2 Tecnologia Intel My WiFi Tecnologia Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Tecnologias de monitoramento térmico Acesso de Memória Flexível Intel Tecnologia de proteção da identidade Intel Identity ‡ Segurança e confiabilidade Novas instruções Intel AES Intel Software Guard Extensions IntelSGX Intel Memory Protection Extensions Intel MPX Intel Trusted Execution Technology ‡ Bit de desativação de execução ‡ Programa Intel da Plataforma de Imagem Estável SIPP Tecnologia de virtualização Intel VT-x ‡ Tecnologia de virtualização Intel para E/S dirigida VT-d ‡ Intel VT-x com Tabelas de páginas estendidas EPT ‡ Todas as informações fornecidas estão sujeitas a alterações a qualquer momento, sem aviso prévio. A Intel pode alterar o ciclo de vida da fabricação, as especificações e as descrições dos produtos a qualquer momento, sem aviso prévio. As informações aqui contidas são fornecidas "no estado em que se encontram" e a Intel não atribui qualquer declaração ou garantias relacionadas à precisão das informações, nem sobre os recursos dos produtos, disponibilidade, funcionalidade ou compatibilidade dos produtos listados. Para obter mais informações sobre os produtos ou sistemas, entre em contato com o fornecedor do sistema. As classificações da Intel são apenas para fins gerais, educacionais e de planejamento e consistem nos números ECCN Número de Classificação de Controle de Exportações e HTS Programa de Tarifas Harmonizadas. Quaisquer usos das classificações da Intel são sem os recursos da Intel e não devem ser interpretados como uma representação ou garantia relacionada ao ECCN ou HTS apropriado. Como exportadora e/ou importadora, sua empresa é responsável por determinar a classificação correta de sua transação. Consulte a Ficha técnica para obter definições formais de propriedades e recursos de produtos. ‡ Este recurso pode não estar disponível em todos os sistemas de computação. Verifique com o fornecedor do sistema para determinar se seu sistema oferece este recurso ou consulte as especificações de seu sistema motherboard, processador, chipset, alimentação, HDD, controle gráfico, memória, BIOS, drivers, monitor de máquina virtual [VMM], software de plataforma e/ou sistema operacional para saber sobre a compatibilidade do recurso. A funcionalidade, o desempenho e outros benefícios deste recurso podem variar, dependendo das configurações do sistema. Os números dos processadores Intel não são indicação de desempenho. Os números dos processadores diferenciam recursos dentro de cada família de processador, e não entre famílias diferentes de processadores. Consulte para obter mais detalhes. O TDP máximo e do sistema se baseiam nos piores casos. O TDP real pode ser inferior, se nem todas as E/Ss para chipsets forem utilizadas. SKUs "anunciados" ainda não estão disponíveis. Favor consultar a data de lançamento para a disponibilidade no mercado. Frequência máxima de turbo refere-se à frequência máxima do processador de núcleo único que pode ser atingida com a Tecnologia Intel Turbo Boost. Mais informações estão disponíveis no site Consulte para obter mais informações, incluindo detalhes sobre quais processadores são compatíveis com a Tecnologia Hyper-Threading Intel. Os processadores compatíveis com a computação de 64 bits na arquitetura Intel requerem BIOS habilitados para arquitetura Intel 64. Consulte para sistemas compatíveis com a Tecnologia de proteção da identidade Intel. Alguns produtos suportam as novas instruções AES com uma atualização da Configuração do processador, em particular, i7-2630QM/i7-2635QM, i7-2670QM/i7-2675QM, i5-2430M/i5-2435M, i5-2410M/i5-2415M. Favor entrar em contato com o OEM para o BIOS que inclui a mais recente atualização da Configuração do processador. Informações BásicasMarcaDellModeloG7-7588-A30LinhaNão possuiSérieG7Características do ProdutoArmazenamento e Sem FioBluetoothWi-FiEntradas e SaídasÁudioUSB-CUSB RJ-45Leitor de cartãoQuantidades de Entradas USB4 USBMídias CompatíveisNão Possui Entrada de MídiaProcessamento e Desempenho GráficoProcessadorIntel Core i7 8750HGeração do Processador8ª GeraçãoVelocidade do OperacionalWindows 10Placa de Vídeo DedicadaGeForce GTX 1050 TiTipo de Placa de VídeoDedicada Off-BoardMemória de Vídeo VRAM da Tela/Imagem e TecladoEspecificações Long-lasting laptop with gaming power. The Asus TUF Gaming FX705GE can run all the latest games smoothly at 1080p. The long battery life proves to be a pleasant surprise. However, the notebook does not offer a lot of ports.“TUF” The Ultimate Force notebooks from Asus are intended for price-conscious buyers. In absolute terms, our review device that retails for 1200 Euros ~$1361 is not a very cheap notebook, but it finds its place right at the bottom of the gaming segment. This notebook is no stranger to us. We have already reviewed a sibling model known as the Asus TUF Gaming FX705GM. The competing devices include the Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52, the Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH and the Schenker XMG the FX705GE and the FX705GM are identically built, we shall skip the sections that deal with the case, connectivity, input devices and the speakers. Note There are a few small differences. You can find all the appropriate information in the review of the Asus TUF Gaming GB , DDR4 2666, single-channel, two RAM slots one slot occupied inch 169, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, AU Optronics IPS, glossy noMainboardIntel Cannon Lake HM370StorageSK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831, 128 GB , + Toshiba MQ04ABF100, 1089 GB freeSoundcardRealtek ALC233 Intel Cannon Point PCH - cAVSConnections1 USB 2 USB / Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections combined audio jack, TPM RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN 10/100/1000MBit/s, Intel Wireless-AC 9560 a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/, Bluetooth x width x depth in mm x x = x x 11 inBattery64 Wh, 4240 mAh Lithium-Ion, VOperating SystemMicrosoft Windows 10 Home 64 BitCameraWebcam HDPrimary Camera MPixAdditional featuresSpeakers Stereo, Keyboard Chiclet-style, Keyboard Light yes, McAfee LiveSafe trail version, 24 Months kg = oz / pounds, Power Supply 479 g = oz / poundsNote The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar the FX705GM had a metal display lid, our current review device features a plastic display FX705GM had an RGB keyboard backlight. The FX705GE comes with a monochrome red keyboard FX705GE has a smaller fan grill. Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 Schenker XMG A707 Coffee Lake Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T DIN A4 ❌432 mm / 17 inch 290 mm / inch 29 mm / inch lbs419 mm / inch 289 mm / inch 27 mm / inch lbs413 mm / inch 305 mm / 12 inch mm / inch mm / inch mm / 11 inch mm / inch lbs297 mm / inch 210 mm / inch 1 mm / inch lbs 03570105140175210245280315350385420455490525560595630665TooltipAsus TUF FX705GE-EW096T Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf Ø650 547-681 Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf Ø643 499-661 Pixel arrangementThe matte display of the FX705GE operates with a native resolution of 1920x1080. The contrast ratio 10681 is good. However, the display brightness cd/m² could have been a little higher. We see a contrast ratio of 10001 and a screen brightness of at least 300 cd/m² as good. The competitors have slightly brighter displays. Positive The screen does not suffer from PWM flickering. 282cd/m²274cd/m²273cd/m²303cd/m²299cd/m²301cd/m²305cd/m²282cd/m²301cd/m² Distribution of brightnessAU Optronics i1Pro 2Maximum 305 cd/m² Nits Average cd/m² Minimum cd/m²Brightness Distribution 90 %Center on Battery 301 cd/m²Contrast 10681 Black cd/m²ΔE Color calibrated Greyscale sRGB Argyll 3D57% AdobeRGB 1998 Argyll 3D AdobeRGB 1998 Argyll 3D sRGB Argyll 3D Display P3 Argyll 3DGamma TUF FX705GE-EW096TIPS, 1920x1080, Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750HIPS, 1920x1080, XMG A707 Coffee LakeIPS, 1920x1080, Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6IPS, 1920x1080, TUF FX705GMIPS, 1920x1080, Display P3 5% 5% 6% -1% sRGB -2% -3% -1% 2% AdobeRGB 1998 -2% -3%63 -1% 0%Response Times10%8%15%73% Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *39 ?21, 18 ? 186% ? ? ? Response Time Black / White *28 ?16, 1224 ?14, 1014% ? ? ? PWM Frequency119000 ?90122000 ?95Screen-36%-38%-43%8%Brightness 10%362 21%365 22%234 -22%Brightness291318 9%350 20%341 17%228 -22%Brightness Distribution9091 1%91 1%89 -1%85 -6%Black Level * -82% -4% -14% 29%Contrast1068645 -40%1248 17%1141 7%1170 10%Colorchecker dE 2000 * -63% -101% -116% 28%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * -93% -120% -134% 36%Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * -55% -13% -5% 27%Greyscale dE 2000 * -79% -231% -251%2 8% 89% 103% 88% 83% 89%CCT6392 102%6911 94%7659 85%8066 81%6394 102%Color Space Percent of AdobeRGB 1998 -2%55 -4%56 -2%58 2%Color Space Percent of sRGB -3%84 -3%86 -1%89 2%Total Average Program / Settings-9% / -24%-10% / -25%-9% / -28%27% / 15%* ... smaller is better Screen Flickering / PWM Pulse-Width ModulationℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation PWM . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering flickering / PWM not detectedIn comparison 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19200 minimum 5 - maximum 3846000 Hz was measured. Right out of the box, the color reproduction of the display is quite good. The DeltaE 2000 color deviation of misses the target value Delta E less than 3 by a very small margin. The display does not suffer from a bluish cast. The color reproduction can be improved only minimally by way of calibration. After calibration, the DeltaE 2000 sinks to and the grayscale looks significantly more balanced. The screen fails to cover both the sRGB 87% and the Adobe RGB 57% color spaces. By means of our color profile, the color reproduction can be improved. However before downloading it, you should make sure that your laptop has the same display model manufacturer + model number as our review device, because otherwise our color profile can result in worse color reproduction. Displays from different manufacturers can often be found within notebooks from the same model range. Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry ghosting. Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16 ms rise↘ 12 ms fallThe screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for comparison, all tested devices range from minimum to 240 maximum ms. » 65 % of all devices are means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices ms. ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21 ms rise↘ 18 ms fallThe screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for comparison, all tested devices range from minimum to 636 maximum ms. » 50 % of all devices are means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices 35 ms. Asus has equipped the FX705GE with an IPS panel with stable viewing angles. Therefore, the screen content can be read from any position. The display brightness is only high enough for indoor use. Outside, the screen is readable only when the sun does not shine too FX705GE outdoors shot under the shining sunThe TUF Gaming FX705GE is a gaming notebook that can run all the latest titles in Full HD. Our review device can be had for 1200 Euros ~$1361. Other hardware configurations are also available. The prices start at 900 Euros ~$1020.The FX705GE offers the three following fan modes “Overboost”, “Balanced” and “Quiet”. These modes can be selected with the help of a function key. We used the “Balanced” mode for this review. However, we also conducted a few benchmarks in “Overboost” mode. There is not a lot of difference between the two modes in terms of performance. When we used the “Quiet” mode, the Turbo boost was utilized FX705GE comes with a Core i7-8750H. It is a high-end, hexa-core Coffee Lake CPU from Intel with a TDP of 45 watts. The processor has a base clock of GHz and a boost clock of GHz for six cores, 4 GHz for four cores and GHz for one/two cores. In the multi-core section of the Cinebench R15 benchmark, the processor runs at GHz the clock speed is the same in “Overboost” mode for a few seconds. Then the clock rate sinks to to GHz 3 to GHz in “Overboost” mode. In the single-core benchmark, the CPU operates at to GHz clock speeds are identical in “Overboost” mode. When running on battery power, the processor consistently operates at GHz. We check if the Turbo boost can be used over an extended period of time by running the Cinebench R15 multi-core benchmark in a continuous loop for 30 minutes. The results fall after the first benchmark run. After that they keep fluctuating between 1000 and 1070 points. The Turbo boost is utilized. Our review device achieves similar results when running in “Overboost” mode. However, when running in this mode, we observed fewer fluctuations. In “Quiet” mode, the results fluctuate between 770 and 820 points. 065130195260325390455520585650715780845910975104011051170TooltipAsus TUF FX705GM Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H Ø1022 Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H; Overboost Ø1066 CPU clocks during the execution of the CB15 loopCinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit6236 Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit34168 Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit5456 Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit173 Points Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit1116 Points Cinebench R15 OpenGL fps Cinebench R15 Ref. Match % HelpCinebench R15 CPU Single 64BitAverage of class Gaming - 312, n=245, last 2 years 251 Points ∼77% +45%Asus TUF FX705GMIntel Core i7-8750H 175 Points ∼53% +1%Schenker XMG A707 Coffee LakeIntel Core i7-8750H 174 Points ∼53% +1%Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6Intel Core i5-8300H 173 Points ∼53% 0%Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750HIntel Core i7-8750H 173 Points ∼53% 0%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TIntel Core i7-8750H 173 Points ∼53% Average Intel Core i7-8750H 163 - 177, n=86 172 Points ∼52% -1% CPU Multi 64BitAverage of class Gaming 400 - 5663, n=244, last 2 years 2607 Points ∼27% +134%Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750HIntel Core i7-8750H 1230 Points ∼13% +10%Asus TUF FX705GMIntel Core i7-8750H 1137 Points ∼12% +2%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TIntel Core i7-8750H 1116 Points ∼11% Average Intel Core i7-8750H 863 - 1251, n=93 1113 Points ∼11% 0%Schenker XMG A707 Coffee LakeIntel Core i7-8750H 1112 Points ∼11% 0%Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6Intel Core i5-8300H 807 Points ∼8% -28%Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32BitAverage of class Gaming 5847 - 11940, n=24, last 2 years 8368 Points ∼51% +34%Average Intel Core i7-8750H 6236 - 6645, n=25 6479 Points ∼39% +4%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TIntel Core i7-8750H 6236 Points ∼38% Rendering Multiple CPUs 32BitAverage of class Gaming 30491 - 85088, n=24, last 2 years 52989 Points ∼38% +55%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TIntel Core i7-8750H 34168 Points ∼25% Average Intel Core i7-8750H 29664 - 35307, n=25 33163 Points ∼24% -3%Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core ScoreAverage Intel Core i7-8750H 20725 - 22665, n=13 21871 Points ∼27% +1%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TIntel Core i7-8750H 21635 Points ∼27% 32 Bit Single-Core ScoreAverage Intel Core i7-8750H 3734 - 4163, n=13 3995 Points ∼78% +7%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TIntel Core i7-8750H 3734 Points ∼73% Geekbench 64 Bit Multi-Core ScoreAverage of class Gaming last 2 years 38127 Points ∼93% +124%Average Intel Core i7-8750H 17048 - 22006, n=8 19665 Points ∼48% +15%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TIntel Core i7-8750H 17048 Points ∼42% 64 Bit Single-Core ScoreAverage of class Gaming last 2 years 6453 Points ∼92% +42%Average Intel Core i7-8750H 4548 - 4997, n=8 4839 Points ∼69% +6%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TIntel Core i7-8750H 4548 Points ∼65% Geekbench - 64 Bit Multi-Core ScoreAverage of class Gaming 18976 - 71700, n=33, last 2 years 43914 Points ∼49% +143%Average Intel Core i7-8750H 17709 - 23313, n=17 21069 Points ∼23% +17%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TIntel Core i7-8750H 18068 Points ∼20% 64 Bit Single-Core ScoreAverage of class Gaming 5249 - 8936, n=33, last 2 years 7154 Points ∼74% +52%Average Intel Core i7-8750H 4669 - 5146, n=17 4982 Points ∼51% +6%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TIntel Core i7-8750H 4692 Points ∼48% The laptop is very responsive. We did not encounter any problems. The notebook revealed no issues related to system performance. The Intel Core i7-8750H is a hexa-core processor that offers more than enough computing power for applications that go far beyond gaming. It will not become obsolete for years. Thanks to the inclusion of a dedicated GPU, the Asus notebook can run video games. Our review device receives good results in the PCMark benchmarks. The system performance can be further increased by enabling dual-channel mode. Doing so will increase the performance by a few percentage points. PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 4230 pointsPCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 5038 pointsPCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 5461 pointsPCMark 10 Score 4975 pointsHelp PCMark 10 ScoreAverage of class Gaming 4477 - 9331, n=197, last 2 years 7264 Points ∼72% +46%Asus TUF FX705GMGeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G 5169 Points ∼51% +4%Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750HGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G 4982 Points ∼49% 0%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831 4975 Points ∼49% Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 4532 - 5162, n=10 4851 Points ∼48% -2%Schenker XMG A707 Coffee LakeGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB 4734 Points ∼47% -5% EssentialsAverage of class Gaming 7334 - 12176, n=196, last 2 years 10462 Points ∼81% +15%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831 9110 Points ∼70% Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750HGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G 8989 Points ∼69% -1%Asus TUF FX705GMGeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G 8791 Points ∼68% -4%Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 7142 - 9110, n=10 8371 Points ∼65% -8%Schenker XMG A707 Coffee LakeGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB 7873 Points ∼61% -14% ProductivityAverage of class Gaming 6161 - 11833, n=196, last 2 years 9459 Points ∼75% +31%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831 7201 Points ∼57% Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750HGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G 7057 Points ∼56% -2%Asus TUF FX705GMGeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G 7025 Points ∼56% -2%Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 6607 - 7332, n=10 6989 Points ∼55% -3%Schenker XMG A707 Coffee LakeGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB 6920 Points ∼55% -4% Digital Content CreationAverage of class Gaming 5288 - 16424, n=196, last 2 years 10573 Points ∼53% +107%Asus TUF FX705GMGeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G 6071 Points ∼30% +19%Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 5070 - 5616, n=10 5305 Points ∼27% +4%Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750HGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G 5290 Points ∼26% +4%Schenker XMG A707 Coffee LakeGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB 5285 Points ∼26% +4%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831 5096 Points ∼25% PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2Average of class Gaming 3570 - 6657, n=42, last 2 years 5109 Points ∼77% +21%Asus TUF FX705GMGeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G 4660 Points ∼70% +10%Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H, Hynix HFS128G39TND 4253 Points ∼64% +1%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831 4230 Points ∼64% Schenker XMG A707 Coffee LakeGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB 4196 Points ∼63% -1%Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 3894 - 4371, n=10 4162 Points ∼63% -2%Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750HGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G 4148 Points ∼62% -2%An NVMe SSD from SK Hynix serves as the system drive. It comes in the form-factor and has a storage capacity of 128 GB. Straight out of the box, only 89 GB is available to the user. The rest of the storage space is occupied by the recovery partition and the Windows installation files. The transfer rates of the SSD are very good. NVMe SSDs achieve significantly faster transfer speeds than SATA-III models, because they are connected via PCI Express x4. The gaming notebook offers plenty of storage space. In addition to the SSD, Asus also put a HDD 1 TB, 5400 rpm inside the Read 868 MB/s Sequential Write MB/s Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TSK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750HToshiba KBG30ZMT128GSchenker XMG A707 Coffee LakeSamsung SSD 970 EVO 250GBAcer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6Hynix HFS128G39TNDAsus TUF FX705GMWDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256GAverage SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831 Average of class Gaming CrystalDiskMark / 6-36%132%-43%102%4%423% Write -21% 12% -31% 15% ? - n=320%208 ? - 363, n=161, last 2 years130% Read -19% 11% -38% 12% ?37 - 41, n=36%70 ? - n=161, last 2 years89% Write -60%1420 343% -58%1295 304%284 ?203 - 327, n=3-11%3255 ? - 9867, n=129, last 2 years916% Read Seq1012843 -17%1307 29% -52%1325 31%772 ?271 - 1033, n=3-24%3232 ?467 - 7955, n=129, last 2 years219% Write 4K -55% 37% -31% 44%239 ? - 269, n=321%544 ? - 1656, n=160, last 2 years176% Read 4K -28% 30% -23% 18%279 ?272 - 285, n=33%716 ?291 - 6332, n=160, last 2 years164% Write Seq -51%1533 470%136 -49%1301 384%303 ?269 - 321, n=313%4135 ?436 - 14960, n=161, last 2 years1438% Read Seq Q32T115951037 -35%3554 123%553 -65%1704 7%1597 ?1589 - 1606, n=30%5622 ?958 - 18690, n=161, last 2 years252%The Asus TUF FX705GE comes with Nvidia’s GeForce GTX 1050 Ti. It is a mid-range, Pascal-based GPU. It has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, supports DirectX 12 and it runs at up to 1620 MHz. The results in the 3DMark benchmarks are on the normal level for this kind of GPU. The “Overboost” mode does not improve performance in any way. In addition to the GTX 1050 Ti, there is also Intel’s integrated UHD Graphics 630 on board. The laptop supports Nvidia’s Optimus technology that enables automatic switching between a dedicated and an integrated graphics adapter. In day-to-day use and when running on battery power, Intel’s graphics unit is used. Nvidia’s GPU is utilized when playing video games and running other graphically demanding applications. 3DMark 11 Performance 9298 points3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score 75191 points3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score 26828 points3DMark Fire Strike Score 6989 points3DMark Time Spy Score 2571 pointsHelp 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPUAverage of class Gaming 1029 - 72070, n=236, last 2 years 36561 Points ∼100% +286%Asus TUF FX705GMNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H 13722 Points ∼38% +45%Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 8304 - 10402, n=36 9591 Points ∼26% +1%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H 9466 Points ∼26% Schenker XMG A707 Coffee LakeNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H 9332 Points ∼26% -1%Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i5-8300H 9147 Points ∼25% -3%3DMark1920x1080 Fire Strike GraphicsAverage of class Gaming 781 - 53059, n=243, last 2 years 27044 Points ∼100% +247%Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750HNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H 7860 Points ∼29% +1%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H 7791 Points ∼29% Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 6792 - 8376, n=38 7743 Points ∼29% -1%Schenker XMG A707 Coffee LakeNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H 7695 Points ∼28% -1%Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i5-8300H 7610 Points ∼28% -2%1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard GraphicsAverage of class Gaming 15902 - 192520, n=169, last 2 years 122595 Points ∼100% +149%Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i5-8300H 51038 Points ∼42% +3%Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750HNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H 50732 Points ∼41% +3%Schenker XMG A707 Coffee LakeNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H 50128 Points ∼41% +2%Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 43721 - 53978, n=37 50013 Points ∼41% +1%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H 49314 Points ∼40% 2560x1440 Time Spy GraphicsAverage of class Gaming 224 - 22547, n=243, last 2 years 10728 Points ∼100% +323%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H 2536 Points ∼24% Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 1990 - 2536, n=16 2309 Points ∼22% -9%The CPU-GPU combination of the Asus notebook can run all the latest games smoothly. Our review device can achieve playable frames in most titles at 1080p resolution the screen resolution is also 1080p. In terms of graphics settings, you will have to stick to medium or high presets in most cases. There are only a few games that can run on the highest settings. Only titles that have low system requirements can be played at resolutions above 1080p you will need an external monitor to achieve resolutions higher than 1080p.The FX705GE does not ship with the latest Nvidia drivers. Our review device features the Nvidia GeForce WHQL drivers. You cannot download the latest driver package from Asus’s website. The Windows update function also does not offer any newer drivers. Unfortunately, the drivers downloaded directly from Nvidia’s website cannot be installed. It would appear as though only drivers that were customized by Asus can be ran the video game The Witcher 3 for one hour on the highest settings to see if the performance of the laptop falls during long gaming sessions. Over the entire run of gameplay, the player-controlled character stands still. We did not observe any frame-rate performance during the stress test with The Witcher 3When idle, the fans often stand still, which leads to silent operation - except when the hard drive is being accessed. Otherwise, the fans run at a low speed. However, under load, the fans really start to spin up. Here, we measured a sound pressure level of dBA. Under medium load, the system noise amounts to 43 dBA. Those who want less noise should enable the “Quiet” mode. In this mode, the fans operate less frequently and at lower speeds, which is why the boost clocks of the CPU are considerably lower. Unfortunately, our review device suffers from occasional coil whine. Noise Level Idle / / dBAHDD dBALoad 43 / dBA 30 dBsilent40 dBAaudible50 dBAloud min , med , max Audix TM1, Arta 15 cm distance environment noise dBA dBA 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus TUF FX705GE-EW096TThe FX705GE during the stress testThe FX705GE completes our stress test Prime95 and FurMark running continuously for at least one hour with different results. When plugged in, the CPU runs at to GHz and the GPU operates at 1500 to 1700 MHz. When running on battery power, the CPU is throttled down to 800 MHz and the core clock of the GPU fluctuates between 1000 and 1050 notebook does not become excessively hot. During the stress test, the 50 °C 122 °F mark is exceeded only at one measurement point. In everyday use, the temperatures always stay within reasonable bounds. The stress test is an extreme case scenario, which is very unlikely to occur in real life. We use it to test system stability. °C106 °C104 °C114 F °C87 °C128 F34 °C93 F °C79 °C78 °C80 F Maximum °C = 128 FAverage °C = 97 F °C94 °C107 °C112 °C78 °C90 °C86 F26 °C79 °C80 °C80 F Maximum °C = 112 FAverage 32 °C = 90 F Power Supply max. °C = 110 F Room Temperature °C = 74 F FIRT 550-Pocket± The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is °C / 97 F, compared to the average of °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.- The maximum temperature on the upper side is °C / 128 F, compared to the average of °C / 105 F, ranging from to °C for the class Gaming.± The bottom heats up to a maximum of °C / 112 F, compared to the average of °C / 110 F+ In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of °C / 93 F.+ The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of °C / F and are therefore cool to the touch. + The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was °C / 84 F + °C / F. dBA 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus TUF FX705GE-EW096TApple MacBook 12 Early 2016 GHzFrequency diagram checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devicesAsus TUF FX705GE-EW096T audio analysis± speaker loudness is average but good dBBass 100 - 315 Hz- nearly no bass - on average 25% lower than median± linearity of bass is average delta to prev. frequencyMids 400 - 2000 Hz± reduced mids - on average lower than median± linearity of mids is average delta to prev. frequencyHighs 2 - 16 kHz± higher highs - on average higher than median+ highs are linear delta to prev. frequencyOverall 100 - Hz- overall sound is not linear 30% difference to medianCompared to same class» 97% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 2% worse» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 47%Compared to all devices tested» 92% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 5% worse» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%Apple MacBook 12 Early 2016 GHz audio analysis+ speakers can play relatively loud dBBass 100 - 315 Hz± reduced bass - on average lower than median± linearity of bass is average delta to prev. frequencyMids 400 - 2000 Hz+ balanced mids - only away from median+ mids are linear delta to prev. frequencyHighs 2 - 16 kHz+ balanced highs - only 2% away from median+ highs are linear delta to prev. frequencyOverall 100 - Hz+ overall sound is linear difference to medianCompared to same class» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 95% worse» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 50%Compared to all devices tested» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%The power consumption is well within the normal range for this type of hardware. When idle, we measured a maximum power draw of watts. During the stress test, the energy consumption peaked at watts. The power output of the included AC adapter amounts to 120 watts. Note When idle, the notebook consumes less than half the power that its sibling model consumed. In all likelihood, this can be attributed to the fact that Nvidia’s Optimus technology did not function correctly on the sibling model. Our practically oriented Wi-Fi test simulates loads that are consistent with surfing the web. The “balanced” power plan is selected, the display brightness is set to 150 cd/m² and the energy-saving functions are switched off. The Asus TUF FX705GE achieves a battery runtime of 8 h 33 m, which is a very good result. Many office notebooks have shorter battery life. Our current review device lasts twice as long as its sibling model. We already mentioned the reason for this The sibling model consumes significantly more energy under low Runtime WiFi Websurfing Edge 44 8h 33min Battery Runtime - WiFi WebsurfingAsus TUF FX705GE-EW096Ti7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 64 Wh 513 min ∼19% Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750Hi7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 76 Wh 402 min ∼15% -22%Schenker XMG A707 Coffee Lakei7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 62 Wh 378 min ∼14% -26%Average of class Gaming 57 - 745, n=184, last 2 years 363 min ∼14% -29%Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 48 Wh 354 min ∼13% -31%Asus TUF FX705GMi7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 64 Wh 272 min ∼10% -47%Pros+ matte IPS screen + Full HD resolution + compact case + NVMe SSD + HDD + very good battery life + backlit keyboardCons- not a lot of ports - no USB Type-C - no SD card reader - a lot of noise under loadThe Asus TUF Gaming FX705GE-EW096T, provided courtesy of Asus TUF Gaming FX705GE is an entry-level gaming notebook. The combination of a Core i7-8750H and a GeForce GTX 1050 Ti can run all the games in our benchmark library smoothly. However, you will have to lower the resolution and graphics settings in some of the latest AAA titles in order to achieve playable frame Asus TUF Gaming FX705GE is a true gaming laptop that also works well as a notebook for daily tasks. However, it does not feature a lot of NVMe SSD helps create a very responsive system. Even though its capacity amounts only to 128 GB, there is no lack of storage space. The laptop features an additional 1 TB hard drive. Moreover, the notebook also comes with a usable, backlit keyboard. The FX705GE surprises when it comes to battery runtimes. In our Wi-Fi test, it lasts for 8 h 33 m, which is why it beats most office notebooks in terms of battery Full HD IPS screen has a matte surface, good contrast ratio and stable viewing angles. The brightness is okay. However, it could have been higher given the price tag of the FX705GE does not feature plenty of ports. Here, Asus chose to go the minimalist route to differentiate its more premium ROG gaming notebooks from cheaper TUF gaming laptops. The FX705GE has neither an SD card reader nor a USB Type-C port. Furthermore, it offers only one video output. Here, competitors with the same CPU-GPU combination such as the Schenker XMG A707 and the Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH offer significantly more. The Lenovo notebook actually comes with a Thunderbolt 3 port. Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T - 02/18/2019 v6old Sascha Mölck Connectivity47 / 81 → 58% Application Performance94% Gaming - Weighted Average Pricecompare Editor of the original article Sascha Mölck - Senior Tech Writer - 961 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2012What started as a side job during my computer science studies later became my main job For more than 20 years now I have been working as an editor and author in the IT sector. While working in the print sector I also contributed to the creation of various loose-leaf publications and published original written pieces. I have been working for Notebookcheck since 2012. Sascha Mölck, 2019-02-19 Update 2019-02-21

laptop i7 8750h gtx 1050